GuruBlog

Tuesday, November 30, 2004

"Heartbreak lives of pokie addicts"

Two weekends ago, a phone-in was help in South Australia and Victoria for people with concerns or experiences about the pokies. (See previous post Gambling Watch Phone-Ins in two Australian States)

Sunday's Adelaide Sunday Mail recently published an article detailing some of the calls received to the phone in in South Australia. The article is republished in full and makes sobering reading.

Sunday Mail (SA), Page 032 (Sun 28 Nov 2004)
Heartbreak lives of pokie addicts

With heated debate raging among MPs over moves to cut by 3000 the number of poker machines in the state - the legislation is due back before the House of Assembly - desperate South Australians rang a hotline organised by No Pokies MLC Nick Xenophon last weekend to reveal how the pokies have devastated their lives. Here are some of their harrowing stories.

A FEMALE has gone for up to a week without food and has thought of prostitution and even bank robbery to fund her gambling - or suicide as a way out. She gambles whenever she has money, with her biggest one-off loss being $1200. In total, she has gambled away more than $20,000. She says she takes risks she normally would not - such as driving an unregistered car. She is receiving counselling from a psychologist. The woman has an 87-year-old friend who gambled $30,000 after her husband died and had a stroke ``from shock'' when she received her bank statement.

A MALE gambler says he has lost $1 million on pokies over the past nine years - including three houses. He says he started drinking alcohol when his pokie gambling began and blames the pokie points scheme and the fact there are ATMs at venues that allow gamblers to draw out $200 at a time, as many times as they like.

A REFORMED gambler who had a 25-year addiction which cost him two marriages says he would be at venues day and night. On one occasion, he spent his disability pension and his wife's pension in a night. He was attracted by the jackpot hour, double-the-money promotions, and so on.

THE WIFE of a gambler says their marriage is on the rocks because he has lost $100,000 and has had to sell their business. She says he would use his children's money to pay bills and even put their money through the pokies. Her husband suffers from depression compounded by addiction and the fact they have lost everything.

MALE says he would spend 80 per cent of his income on pokies - up to $800 or more at a time.

A 50-YEAR-OLD reformed gambler says she spent time in jail because she defrauded her own company for pokies money, losing a total of $100,000. She was fined and jailed for 18 months in 2001.

MALE gambler who says he has lost $10,000 says he drinks alcohol and smokes continually while he gambles. He began gambling two years ago because he was bored and says he now faces a jail term because he owes $10,000 to Centrelink. He says inducements when he joined the club scheme included getting 15 free spins.

A MALE says his life has been ruined by gambling - he lost his job, his girlfriend and his self-esteem. He says hotels would ring him to get him to come in and gamble if they had not seen him for a while.

MALE problem gambler says he spends his whole pension on pokies and to date has lost about $400,000. In one 12-day stretch he lost $9000. He says the pokies became a problem for him seven years ago.

FEMALE pokies player says she will gamble any time of the day or night. She uses a credit card to get cash to gamble and now owes $1000 on the card. She has been gambling for about 18 months, but it has been a problem only for the past year. She says venues encourage her to play with $5 pokie coins and with prizes, spin wheel and raffles.

A JUSTICE of the Peace who owns a country fodder/stock store says since gambling became so popular, many people can no longer afford to buy food for their animals and stock. He also owns a petrol station and says people are buying $4 worth of petrol and not $5 so they can keep a gold coin for the pokies.

A CALLER'S 27-year-old daughter has a pokies addiction and gambles all her available money every week. She has lost up to $80,000 in seven years. While gambling, she drinks and smokes, which is also seen as a problem. She is a member of a loyalty scheme and receives vouchers and other gambling inducements on her birthday.

A FEMALE gambler who spends between $80 and $150 each visit has lost a total of about $150,000 and says she has been suicidal and has had to sell her house. She has reached the limit on her four credit cards and her relationship with her daughter has become strained. In total, she has probably lost about $150,000. She says she is given free soft drinks and food at venues. Her biggest single loss was $500.

A WOMAN who quit gambling in a pact with her sister three weeks ago says her losses are about $50,000 - ``easily that much'' - and she has run up $30,000 in credit card debts. Initially she gambled while her children were at school, but later also left them at home so she could gamble. She says she spent an average of $1000 a week on the pokies, with her biggest one-day loss being $2000. She used ATMs at pokies venues to withdraw money. She says she has gambled all her adult life, but it only became a problem when she used to meet her mother at the casino during the 1990s.

A MALE, 38, who gambles after work - and has been gambling for five years - says he has lost about $160,000, with the biggest one-day loss being $1500. He uses ATMs and telephone banking to get access to money. He says if ATMs were not in pokie venues he would physically have to leave the premises to get money and would be more likely to come to his senses. Married with three children, he suffers depression as a result of his addiction.

A MOTHER tells of her 30-year-old son who is a problem gambler but won't seek help even though he now is struggling to pay off his home as a result. She estimates his losses are at least $100 a week and she now holds his credit cards. The problem developed about five years ago when he broke up with his fiancee.

A MALE who spends all he has on pokies and has been gambling since pokies were introduced has lost $100,000, with the biggest amount at one sitting being $2000. He says he smokes and drinks while playing, and this exacerbates the problem. The man uses ATMs at venues and says the music and advertising that shows pictures of machines are what lure him to venues.

A MAN says his son gambles his pension, along with large amounts of his father's own salary, which he gives to his son on request. He says his son, who has mental problems and is undergoing counselling, has lost between $20,000 and $30,000.

THE husband of a gambler who has lost $30,000 since she started gambling on pokies in November 2002 says his wife has used ATMs at venues. He says she has resorted to pawning jewellery to get gambling money. The husband says he wrote to pawn brokers to stop them from accepting her goods, but their lawyers said there was nothing they could do because of privacy laws.

ONE caller's sister is a gambler who began playing the pokies three years ago. He says his sister and her partner have reached the limit on 10 credit cards and believes the total amount lost is about $300,000. He says his sister had to sell her house to pay the debts. The caller said his sister would find all sorts of creative ways to raise money to use for her gambling.

A FEMALE gambler says she has lost about $30,000 on the pokies since her marriage breakdown four years ago. She says she uses an ATM at pokie venues to obtain money to gamble with and has pawned items in the past to fund her gambling. Offers such as shop-a-dockets, meals, loyalty schemes and extra cash in the gaming room are enticing, although she says she has never used them. The woman is presently receiving counselling from her doctor.

A CALLER says his disabled brother is a gambler and has lost $15,000 in four years on the pokies. The man says his brother is on a disability pension but is financially inept and has spent his entire pension on the pokies at one particular venue. He said inducements included meat tray raffles and the J card program.

ONE caller says her husband is a gambler who has lost $10,000 on the pokies in six years. She believes her husband's Parkinson's disease and the medication he takes contributes to his gambling addiction. The caller said her husband used to use a credit card to get money for gambling but now used ATMs at pokies venues.

THE wife of a gambler who plays the pokies at the local pubs says her husband started gambling three years ago. The couple has three children aged under four. She says her husband plays the pokies day and night, and is unsure how much money he spends - maybe a few hundred a week. She says her husband uses a credit card to gamble and even stole her card. He also uses an ATM at the venue. The caller said her husband lost his job at a bank, their car was almost repossessed and they are behind in rent payments.

A CALLER says his housemate gambles in the morning and spends $200 to $400 each time. He says while she gambles she drinks alcohol and smokes. While not certain if alcohol is provided free to her, the caller says he believes alcohol accelerates her spending. He says she uses ATMs at the venues to obtain money to gamble.

A BREAKDOWN and five days in hospital has not stopped one gambler from hitting the pokies, a concerned friend says. The friend says the gambler, who spends $300 to $400 a week, lost $500 in a day. The caller says she has been gambling for up to six years and uses a credit card and ATM at the venue to obtain money. The caller mentions another person, with children, who loses their pension on the pokies and then tries to borrow money.

AFTER her children go off to school, one caller says, she goes from one venue to another, spending between $5 and $500, with the most she has lost in one day being $500. She says it made her sick. The gambler says she has lost up to $30,000 and started playing the pokies after her son started school full-time. She says she uses a credit card to gamble, which led to her going bankrupt two years ago. She also uses ATMs at the venues.

For help with gambling or gambling-related problems, call Gambling Helpline, 8363 8636; Uniting Care Wesley Adelaide, 8202 5111; Anglicare SA, 8256 2170; Intensive Therapy Service for Problem Gamblers, Flinders Medical Centre, 8204 4779; Relationships Australia, 8223 4144 or 1800 182 325; Multicultural Break Even Service, 8245 8100


These are stories that are published to ensure that the public is aware of the impact of problem gambling. However for someone that works in the field these are not the exceptions to the rule, unfortunately they are the norm.

Gambling has devastating effects on the individuals, families and the wider community. Everything that can be done to reduce the harm from gambling should be done. It is time to put people before profits.

GG

Monday, November 29, 2004

Shock Horror! Club encourages gamblers to gamble.

Saturday's Herald-Sun (and Sydney's Daily Telegraph) report on a NSW Club that is facing fines of up to $300,000 "following reports it instructed staff to encourage customers to play the pokies."

How naive can you be? Hotels and clubs are trying to make money from poker machines. This is a business. Of course it is not in line with responsible gambling obligations but does that mean they don't try and encourage gamblers to gamble and gamble more and more.

The club in question unfortunately put their 'customer service' policy
in writing which brought their undoing. The practice of not holding $2 coins is however extremely common across the industry due to the $1 tokenised nature of most Australian machines (i.e. they will only accept $1 coins or notes - coins of other denominations are not accepted.) This is also very easy to achieve and get away with for a venue as due to the high number of $1 coins on hand it is easy to bank $2 coins and only circulate $1 through the venue.

Responsible gambling means for most industry doing what you have to do as required by law not what might benefit your patrons. And of course nothing should prevent maximum revenue being achieved - keep them at the machine and keep them happy is the core business of the gambling industry.

Now there will be the probe into this club's behaviour and they may get fined, but nothing really will change. There is simply too much money to be made for all involved, except the players of course.

Gambling has winners and losers but it isn't a fair bet as we always know who wins.

GG

Saturday, November 27, 2004

"Addiction to gambling tax: its a losing bet"

Today's Sydney Morning Herald reports that the dependence on many Australian states on gambling taxes to support the state budget must end or many states will be unable to deal with the budgetary stress caused by an aging population.

The Australian Productivity Commission, authors of the seminal inquiry into gambling in Australia "Australia's Gambling Industries", has found that as most gambling revenue is contributed by those under 55, as the proportion over 55 increases gambling revenue will decrease while the need for more government services to support older Australians will increase. This pressure would mean that additional revenue from other sources would be neccessary such as increased GST or income tax.

The article also contains a number of interesting statistics:

State governments have come to rely heavily on gambling taxes. Research by CommSec shows average per capita spending on gambling has doubled in the past decade to $15.50 a week.
Most of this is spent on poker machines, casinos and lotteries, which are heavily taxed by the states. Betting on racing averaged just $2 a week.
Gambling accounts for 3.4 per cent of the average weekly household budget, up from just over 2 per cent 12 years ago. But it may have hit saturation point. The commission notes it has plateaued at 3.4 per cent since 1998-99, suggesting any new forms of gambling will only cannibalise existing gaming revenue.

The commission also noted that all other things being equal, and rates of gambling tax not increasing, States will continue to be dependent on gambling revenue as it will remain similar to current proportions of state revenue (more than 15% in Victoria) but this would leave the state with a deficit.

States need to realise that gambling is not going to be the cash cow it has been to date. They also need to realise that they need more regular gamblers and less problem gamblers as a problem gambler will eventually be a non-gambler as they will either run out of money or seek help.

We need to have gambling operators and governments realise that there is a better way to deliver gambling. A way that gives players an informed choice, more control and supports them rather than trying to milk them for every dollar.

Only when real 'responsible and informed gambling' is available will gambling truly be an entertainment medium and not simply a dangerous and potentially harmful pursuit.

GG

Friday, November 26, 2004

Gambling in the Southern States - Action on various fronts

Lots of things are happening in the southern states of Australia in relation to gambling.

In South Australia, The Adelaide Advertiser reports that the South Australian government will be required to spend 3% of gambling taxes on the Gambler's Rehabilitation Fund. The Gambler's Rehabilitation Fund funds research, counselling and prevention services for problem gambling.

3% is estimated to equate to about $10 million annually in South Australia. If 3% of the Victorian government's share of poker machine proftis went to problem gambling it would be about $23 million annually compared to the $26.7 million promised over 2 years by the current government.

Meanwhile in Tasmania
, the state government is resisting calls for an independent social and economic impact study into gambling after it was revealed that more than $2 billion was turned over in gambling in the last financial year. The Hobart Mercury reports that welfare groups such as the Tasmanian Council of Social Services (TASCoss) and opposition parties, the Greens and Liberals are pushing for an examination of the impact on the island state as despite this equating to more than $4000 per Tasmanian adult, many say the problem gambling impacts are even more severe.

Here in Victoria, we frequently see the desperation of some problem gamblers as they turn to crime and appear in the courts. The Herald-Sun reports of a chronic gambler who after having difficulty repaying loan sharks was forced into an identity fraud scheme where he stole drivers licences, bank details, and recruited other problem gamblers into the scheme which scammed more than $1 million from banks and financial institutions.

Depressing stuff. However since it is friday afternoon how about this as a christmas present in honour of the woman that legalised poker machine gambling in Victoria.

I'm sure the "Spot on Joan" handbag, honouring former Victorian Premier Joan Kirner would make the perfect accompaniment to a trip to the pokies or maybe to bingo. For those that don't know Joan Kirner introduced legalised gaming machines and the casino in 1991 in response to the financial troubles affecting the state with the collapse of the State Bank. Kirner has recently acknowledged that introducing pokies was not the right thing to do and she would not have made the same decision if she had the chance now.

So why not keep your gambling money and go to www.polichicks.org (A Victorian leftist fashion label) where this handbag complete with lipstick/keys pocket will cost you $50. (Note: A matching Gough Whitlam - It's Time edition is also available.)

Life is a gamble so why gamble with your life.

GG

Thursday, November 25, 2004

Trump - "You're Bankrupt!" but still gambling

Donald Trump's signature branded Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts Inc. has filed for bankruptcy in the US according to this article on Newsday.com.
America's 74th richest person led the company that he is chairman and chief executive of into a financial disaster accumulating $1.8 Billion US in debt.

Trump may not be personally effected financially but I can expect that many of his employees may be hearing his famous line "You're Fired!" as the company not only tries to trade its way out of bankruptcy but also faces increasing competition from new casinos in Trump's stronghold of Atlantic City and generally expanded gaming in the US.

Not everyone that works in gambling is a gambler, nor are they bad people. In fact most are honest hardworking people performing in jobs to the best of their ability in what is an industry that due to the actions of more senior managers and executives often have to day-to-day deal with the stress from working in the industry.

Sometimes you just wish that those at the top think about things other than money and may be actually look at the consequences it has on gamblers, their own employees and the community in general.

GG

Wednesday, November 24, 2004

Player information helps the operators - can help the gamblers?

People who read this blog regularly will know that I often rave on about wht I think is a desperately needed plank in the responsible operation of gaming machines, namely a compulsory card based loyalty system which has responsible gambling features that would have benefits for operators, gamblers and the wider community.

This article in the Casino City Times titled "Taking Retailers' Cues, Harrah's Taps into Science of Gambling" dicusses how Harrah's, the US Casino operator, uses extensive player information to support targetted marketing campaigns which attract players with a personal invitation to gamble at one of their casinos.

The casino business for years has tried to lure wealthy tourists and persnickety baccarat players to Las Vegas with the offer of swank hotel rooms and lavish entertainment. Harrah's has turned itself into one of the biggest operators in the industry with an entirely different approach: Borrowing tricks from big retailers, the entertainment giant has amassed a staggering array of data about its customers. With the help of math and statistics graduates, it now uses numbers to make decisions that in other parts of the casino world have traditionally come from the gut.

Harrah's whilst getting benefits for themselves is providing benefits for the gamblers and not just in rewards for gambling. Harrah's has built in a range of responsible gambling measures into their loyalty system. Among these is annual player history statements. These statements are valuable as they are not property by propert but report on play in a given year on all Harrah's properties across the USA. For more information on their player information statements click here. For an example statement click here. They also have other responsible gambling activities such as self-exclusion and staff training.

Harrah's goes further in trying to learn more about its customer base by conducting a yearly survey of gamblers versus non-gamblers in the US on a variety of issues. It makes interesting reading and is available here.

Overall Harrah's is a highly successful casino operator which puts the emphasis on obtaining and using player information and a loyalty system to attract and retain customers. The only step that Harrah's need to take is compulsory card use nationwide as they already do in Missouri due to legislation:
Missouri gaming regulations limit all patrons to a $500 buy-in per gaming session (every two hours). For this reason, all visitors to Harrah´s St. Louis must present a valid Total Rewards card for admission to either of our two themed casinos. Valid ID required to obtain Harrah´s Total Rewards Card. Must be at least 21 years of age to enter casino.

Leaving the $500 limit every two hours aside (is $500 every two hours a limit?) the compulsory card use has a range of other benefits especially in self-exclusion but also as previously discussed in a range of responsible gambling measures.

The world's gambling operators need to look at Harrah's and learn from their successes, and may be do even more about responsible gambling as it could be the real secret to Harrah's success.

GG

Tuesday, November 23, 2004

Study into Responsible Gambling Features shows only a compulsory card system will work

Focal Research in Nova Scotia, Canada has released research assessing the effectiveness of responsible gambling features in Video Lottery Terminals (the equivalent of our poker machines) which shows that warning messages about time on the machine and allowing the player to set session time limits were not effective for the majority of gamblers.

They recommended that the focus must be on managing spend and the introduction of a interactive card based system.

The results of the current study continue to reinforce the difficulties inherent in offering responsible gaming features that are not interactive. All of the critical factors influencing player success in engaging in responsible gaming are related to his or her personal ability to exercise control over the amount of time and money spent on the activity when engaged in play. The evidence consistently indicates that “impaired control” is a normal characteristic of play and, therefore, for many individuals, has a negative impact on the decision making process during the play session. Effective RGFs are those that allow the individual to enact and enforce personally relevant play decisions before they are involved in the games. The only way that effective, enforceable responsible gaming features can be offered on the terminals is through a central operating system that will allow individual players to be recognized and interact wih the system (e.g., a player card system). The ability of the player to monitor their VL activity, set limits or restrict access at the machine level is the ultimate empowerment model for responsible gaming and appears to be the ideal “tool” to assist players in managing their play.

Why is every major researcher in this field coming up with the same recommendation? Why are some more responsible industry operators admitting that identification of individuals or card based systems are required? Simply because it is blatantly obvious that this is the solution to reducing problem gambling and detecting problems earlier. It won't eliminate problem gambling - that unfortunately in impossible - but it will reduce it by strengthening self-exclusion, ensuring players are aware of their gambling behaviour in terms of number of sessions, time and money spent, and empowering players to make decisions before they are in throws of a gambling session which may impair their judgement. It allows a fail-safe where players can exercise a choice but through delaying the enabling of the decision, poor decisions made in the heat of the moment can be avoided.

If the question is about choice, let them make the choice between gambling or not. If they want to gamble they have to obtain a card which must be inserted into the machine to gamble. If you make it tied to the loyalty system it becomes a win-win situation - operators get information about players, players earn points which can be redeemed for prizes, meals etc. and the community benefits through reduced problem gambling.

Why does this not make sense to some people?

GG

Monday, November 22, 2004

Adelaide Casino taking responsibility for preventing problem gambling

The new New Zealand owners of the Adelaide Casino, the Sky City Group show that our trans-tasman counterparts do things a little differently - they actually want to prevent problem gambling by intervening before it happens.

Today's Adelaide Advertiser (Article here on News.Com.Au or a pdf here) reports that Sky City Adelaide will have dedicated 'host responsibility coordinators' with the objective of preventing harmful behaviours by establishing relationships with patrons and acting when they recognise signs of problem gambling.

This early intervention approach has been applauded by anti-gambling groups in South Australia, and counselling services in the State are supporting the Casino through the training of the specialist staff.

This is a great initiative and shows that casinos can be proactive about preventing problem gambling without harming their bottom line. We can only hope that this new attitude to problem gambling spreads to the other casinos - however considering that Australian gambling now has a clear Victorian dominance with Crown and Tabcorp owning the other major east coast casinos with Star City and Jupiters it unfortunately isn't likely (given the current practices here) although I would like to be proved wrong.

If this program is successful, then hopefully the excuses that some industry operators present will be futile and they will have to accept change to more responsible practices. I just hope that the change will occur sooner rather than later.

GG

Saturday, November 20, 2004

Gambling Watch Phone-Ins in two Australian States

Gambling action groups in South Australia and Victoria, two Australian states, are holding ‘phone-ins’ today and tomorrow to give the opportunity to express their concerns or experiences about gambling. In South Australia, the phone in is being co-ordinated by No Pokies parliamentarian Nick Xenophon and is time to coincide with the passing of legislation to do with poker machines through the South Australian parliament.

The following is in regards to the South Australian Phone in:

The aim of the phone-in is to:

  • Encourage people to come forward if they have experienced gambling problems, either directly or because of a family member.
  • Report a gambling venue that is doing the wrong thing (eg. giving credit, irresponsibly serving alcohol, or giving misleading information about the chance of winning on pokies).
  • Suggest ideas for gambling law reform and programs to further assist those hurt by gambling.

WHEN: Saturday 20th and Sunday 21st November 2004
TIME: 10.00am to 7.00pm.
TELEPHONE: 8237 9112, 8237 9113 OR 8237 9114.
Local call costs apply. Toll Free SA Country Callers call 1800 182 097.


In solidarity with the South Australian event, Victorian gambling action group Community Action on Pokie Problems (CAPP) will be holding their own phone-in.
In Victoria CAPP launched ‘G-Watch’ 12-months ago as a means of encouraging people who had experienced problems with pokies and those working inside the industry who had scruples about social damage being caused by pokies to speak out without fear. Now, with new responsible gambling legislation before State Parliament it’s time to test community mood once again. CAPP plans to support Nick Xenophon’s ‘Pokies Watch Phone-In’ by reactivating ‘G-Watch’ and encouraging people to call in and express concerns about the harm caused by pokies and other forms of gambling.

CAPP Chairperson Mike Hill said that CAPP members greatly admired Nick Xenophon and supported his battle to achieve tougher control over the industry in South Australia. ‘In extending ‘Pokies Watch Phone-In’ to Victoria we are ensuring Nick’s initiative will one day become a fully national ‘No-To-Pokies’ Day. 2004 is the first step in achieving that objective.’

The aim of the phone-in is to:

  • Encourage people to come forward if they have experienced gambling problems, either directly or because of a family member;

  • Allow industry whistleblowers to lodge their ‘inside stories’ with an organisation that will act upon them;

  • Call on members of the community to report a gambling venue that is doing the wrong thing (eg. giving credit, irresponsibly serving alcohol, or giving misleading information about the chance of winning on pokies);and

  • Suggest ideas for gambling law reform and programs to further assist those hurt by gambling.

WHEN: Saturday 20th and Sunday 21st November 2004
TIME: 10.00am to 7.00pm.
TELEPHONE: 03 9380 1459


This is an effort to try and have some co-ordinated action on gambling and they should be supported.

GG

Friday, November 19, 2004

In The National Interest: The Demise of The Gambling Research Panel

The National Interest, a radio program on Australia's Radio National had a feature on The Demise of the Gambling Research Panel. A full transcript which makes interesting reading is available here.

The program features interviews with Linda Hancock, the previous chair of the Gambling Research Panel here in Victoria and the Victorian Minister for Gaming, John Pandazopoulous.

Presenter, Terry Lane, does a good job dissecting some of the issues around the change in policy.

Interesting points are if they are going to go to an Ontario model of gambling. I doubt as Hancock suggests that they will move to the combination of commercial casino/charity casino/racino model as used by the OLGC in Ontario, nor would they move back into Government operation of gambling. What is more likely is that they move to a Responsible Gambling Council of Ontario (RGCO) model of the response to problem gambling where a well funded organisation coordinates research, health promotion etc. but is clearly gambling neutral.

The quality of research produced by the RGCO is excellent however the implementation of their recommendations and therefore the practical effect is questionable. This is of course out of their control as the provincial government as the licensor and licensee has complete control and as recent reports have stated will not be moving away from their dependence on gambling revenue.

It is interesting that Hancock suggests that there is a more interventionist approach required by the government in obtaining information from the gambling industry. This statement is true in that operators have a great deal of information that is useful for research purposes however researchers are not aware of what is available and operators make accessing information difficult. This is an issue that needs to be addressed by government and the new ministerial advisory committee.

Another issue is the movement away from Victorian-based research. State based research is important especially in the case of Victoria as the Victorian model is so different to other states (in terms of the duopoly, operation, inability of venues to own machines etc.) and this has had significant impacts on the consequences of gambling. We also need research like the community perceptions survey to collect the views of Victorians on gambling as this is what can clearly impact policy.

There is a role for national research but that does not mean that state-based research on specific state issues should be discarded.

I recommend that you read the transcript and let me know what you think.

GG

Thursday, November 18, 2004

'Cricket' Gambling Shut Down in China but increases here.

Today the First Cricket Test between Australia and New Zealand in a Trans-Tasman Test Series. Cricket has been plagued by gambling in the past, with fingers often pointing at the sub-continent. Gambling on cricket is however legal in Australia and the start of the international season here marks a large increase in gambling on cricket. However China seems to have its own type of cricket gambling problems.

The website the China View reports in an article Cricket gambling den busted that a disused factory in Shanghai was being used as a gambling den where more than 200 gamblers gambled more than US$220,000 on fights between crickets.

Crickets were even doped up with drugs to control them in order to ensure that fights were possible.

It shows that some people will gamble on anything as it is not the game for them but the gambling which is the attraction.

Now whilst one of Australia's leading cricketers has previously been suspended for drug use, if New Zealand manage to win the first test there may need to be an inquiry especially with Australia at $1.47 to win for $1 and New Zealand at $10.00 (according to Centrebet). On Betfair the odds are even longer for New Zealand with a range of $11.50 to $14.00 for New Zealand to Win compared to $1.49 to $1.54 for Australia.

While it would be hard for any game involving the World Test Champions Australia that have taken all before them, these are the types of matches that attract those gamblers looking to interfere with outcomes as while it is unexpected (thus the long odds) it is possible that New Zealand could win given past results. Again any match including Australia is unlikely given their current record but their are other games where unscrupulous individuals are trying to influence the outcomes of games as has been reported many times even recently by the New Zealand captain Stephen Fleming.

Will this series be clean? I believe so. Is all cricket clean? Maybe not as wherever large sums of money are involved you will always have people wanting more. However we should all enjoy the sport for what it is - a contest between two teams regardless of the money involved.

GG

Wednesday, November 17, 2004

Monte Carlo on the Murray - Victoria's Second Casino in Mildura?

According to today's Herald-Sun there seems to be a push for a second casino in Victoria. It seems however that the proposed location is Mildura, about as far away from Melbourne as you can get. Here is the article in full.

Sparks fly over casino

PLANS for a casino in Mildura have pitched the town's biggest businessman and a local MP into open conflict.

Independent MP Russell Savage has launched a stinging attack on Don Carazza, the man he believes is behind a proposal for Victoria's second casino.

``They are the epitome of what I call the selfish business person,'' Mr Savage said.

``In terms of the social impact, they would have to do it over my dead body.''

Mr Carazza said Mr Savage's comments were ``bulls--t''.

``(It is) not true at all, how can he say that? If he can prove that I'm the man behind the submission, I'll give you $100,000.

``He doesn't like me and I don't like him . . . but I don't have any greed at all.''

Mr Carazza, who owns Mildura's landmark Grand Hotel, denied he was behind one of two submissions to build a casino in the Murray River town in the state's far northwest. But he said he would consider becoming involved if a casino project got off the ground.

Mr Carazza, who operates 24 poker machines and is owner of one of son-in-law Stefano de Pieri's renowned restaurants, denied he had contacted the Victorian Government about a casino.

``We'd be very happy to be part of it, but at this stage I don't think anyone's made any attempt to create one or build one or to try for one,'' he said.

Mr Carazza warned that a venue based exclusively on gambling would fail in any country area.

``If it was a different type of casino, a casino like they do in Europe in a big hotel with two or three roulette tables and a couple blackjack (tables) and a few poker machines . . . then you can have a sort of entertainment centre rather than a casino,'' Mr Carazza said.

``There's some merit in a big hotel that has the ability to provide all the other extras like entertainment, good food, conference facilities . . . then you might have some chance of survival.''

But Mr Savage said anyone who thought they could set up a casino in Mildura would be playing a losing hand.

``My message would be to forget about it, wait until I'm not the member of Parliament up here and they can find someone else who's a little more compliant to their selfish agenda,'' he said.

Since 1999, legislation has allowed for a casino to be built more than 150km from Melbourne, although the Government and Opposition have ruled out issuing a licence.

A dozen informal submissions for country casinos have been made to the State Government, including proposals from Lake Eildon, the Grampians, Lakes Entrance, Warrnambool and three separate bids from Echuca.

From November next year, a second casino could be built anywhere in the state, including the CBD, when Crown's exclusivity agreement ends.

No applications for a new city casino have been submitted to the Government.


So it looks like Victoria probably will have another casino with 5-10 years. In my opinion it will probably be a boutique casino but will definitely need poker machines to support it (probably at least 400 in my experience.) Unfortunately for my colleagues in the region, a location like Echuca, probably would be the most successful of the country locations. However NSW could always steal some of the thunder of any Victorian border casinos by introducing riverboat gambling!?

Do we need another casino? Ultimately it will be for the country communities to decide as I don't believe the city could support another casino. It will also need to be close to existing major attractions and have a large enough tourist base to succeed. Any proposed country casino will have to be a tourist casino so it would be interesting to see what the effect on the local population would be.

Closer to the CBD, potential locations could be the Yarra Valley or Mornington Penninsula - less than an hour's drive from the CBD with a range of other attractions including wineries near by. These locations would again be suited by a boutique style casino. Other advantages of these locations is that they already have reasonable infrastructure - especially true for the Penninsula.

At the moment there are just to many unanswered questions to even contemplate the potential effects but I would expect that a licence would eventually be issued whether we like it or not.

What do you think?

GG


GG's Note: This post has been corrected as the article was in today's Herald-Sun - 17 November 2004

Tuesday, November 16, 2004

Lose it again and again at a Virgin Casino

Following ventures into the Airline, Credit Card, Mobile phone and many other businesses around the world Sir Richard Branson has taken the plunge and moved into the world of gambling.

Only ten weeks ago, Branson opened his new online casino Virgin Games. But he is not stopping there, as Branson has just become a member of the British Casinos Association and is looking at having his signature brand on one of Britain's new 'super-casinos' according to The Guardian.

However the the proposed gambling legislation in the UK is set to be much more restrictive than originally planned after opposition forced significant ammendments including allowing much fewer of the casinos than originally planned. (Reuters)

The worldwide message seems to be that gambling is an issue that the community is concerned about. People are now wary of the effects that gambling expansion can have on their communities and governments need to listen and realise that backlash that has occurred in the UK is not unique and is now likely to happen in many countries around the world.

People are concerned about gambling. Governments take note.

GG

Monday, November 15, 2004

If only we learned the lessons while we were young?

I received this article from last Monday's Newcastle Herald (NSW, Australia). It is an interesting article about how simple lessons if they had been learned in childhood, could teach us something about gambling as adults. It is reprinted in full here.

Newcastle Herald, Page 8 (Mon 8 Nov 2004)
Luck of life's a fortune
OPINION & ANALYSIS

DO you feel lucky?

My kids certainly do. None of them can walk past a lucky dip without wanting to have a go.

You know the sort of thing. There's a bucket or a bin outside a shop or at a weekend market, filled with enticing, brightly coloured packages in various shapes and sizes. Sometimes there's a pink bucket full of girly things and a blue bucket full of things for boys.

I have watched my kids spend their hard-won dollars and cents on these lucky dips quite a number of times over the years and I get the impression that they must be very unlucky children. How else can you explain the rubbish they always seem to get?

Once, when I was sick of hearing them whinge about the junk they just paid a dollar for, I gave them a sensible lecture on small-scale economics. Imagine you were a shopkeeper, I suggested. You are setting up a one-dollar lucky dip. You want to make a profit. Surely you will spend less than a dollar on the items to be wrapped and put in the bucket?

The kids struggled with this concept. There MUST be at least some decent things in the bucket, along with all the rubbish, they argued.

And they still believe this, despite the fact that none of them has ever actually shown me anything even half-decent that they've trawled from a lucky dip. Recently my youngest boy was almost in tears when I wouldn't let him spend $3 on a particularly shiny and exciting looking lucky dip. I tried to tell him the old proverb about a bird in the hand (his $3) being worth two in the bush (the wonderful treasure he imagined he might find in the lucky dip bin), but he didn't want to hear about it.

After much argument I relented, as much to teach him a lesson as anything else. He paid his money, dipped into the bucket, and after much feeling about took out a shiny little package.

He tore off the shiny paper, his eyes alight with excitement and anticipation. And found inside a garish little painted plastic skull on a cheap keyring.

Profoundly disappointed, Jerry was forced to admit he had wasted his money. We gave the skull back to the shopkeeper, who wrapped it up again in more shiny paper and put it back in the lucky dip.

She persuaded Jerry to have another dip, and this time she guided his hand to a package she considered was the best item in the bucket: it was a queer little toy bird on a stick.

We instantly presumed it must have been that much-mentioned "bird in the hand".

My wife reckons there must be some kind of consumer protection law under which you can demand your money back for dud lucky dip prizes. Go figure.

Presumably if that was the case you could just open everything in the bucket until you found something worth having. Personally I can't see it: I think you are buying a mystery and by paying your money you're agreeing to accept whatever lies beneath the wrapping paper, be it bad or worse.

And when it comes to that, are lucky dips really just a form of gambling? Like scratch lottery tickets where you pay your money knowing there's a faint outside chance you might win $10,000 but it's overwhelmingly probable that you'll actually get nothing.

And like poker machines too, all bright and shiny and full of mesmerising but mostly empty promises.

Surprisingly, for all their disappointing experiences my kids can't get over their lucky dip thing. Their heads always turn when they see those beguiling little parcels and I see their hands start twitching.

They start making mental pictures of the wondrous treasures that might be waiting for them at the bottom of that bucket. They can't help thinking that this time it might be different.

And all they have to do is hand over a dollar or two . . .

We're optimistic creatures, we humans.

We love to believe in the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow and most of us seem to cherish the idea, deep inside, that some blinding piece of good luck luck might be waiting around the next corner to transform our lives and make us truly happy.

And if not that corner, then the one after, or the one after that.

For many of us it's a forlorn hope, but I think in some ways that pathetic, exploited, shopworn but incredibly durable belief is one of the things I like best about the human race.


I think that there are lessons to be learned from an article like this. Gambling is attractive because we are humans. No matter how a gambling form is designed and how terrible the odds, someone will always take the risk. That is why when we design gambling options we need to reduce the potential for harm as much as possible. We need to inform potential players of the risks and what they can expect before, during and after the gambling experience, but this will always be only half the story. Wouldn't it have been better if the stallholder in the article had a board up showing people you could get one of these things just like those machines at the supermarket that have toys in them. It may not be worth the money you spend but at least you can make an informed choice.

Business do things to make money. Gambling operators are no different.

What do you think?

GG

Sunday, November 14, 2004

Gambling Addiciton a growing problem in Singapore

According to this article from Channel News Asia, gambling addiction is a growing problem in Singapore despite their being no legalised casinos yet.

More gambling addicts seeking treatment: IMH

Currently Singaporeans travel to casinos in neighbouring Malaysia, however there are other forms of gambling that are legal in the country such as horse racing and football pools.

A decision on leagalised casino in the country will be made in 2005. Gambling Watch Global has more here.

GG

Saturday, November 13, 2004

Canada: Man's suicide a wakeup call about gambling, widow warns

Here is an article from Canada's Globe and Mail titled Man's suicide a wakeup call about gambling, widow warns. (Thanks to Sol Boxenbaum for emailing me this article.)

Here is the article in full.

GG

Man’s suicide a wakeup call about gambling, widow warns
Husband who could not beat addiction to video lottery terminals killed himself
By TU THANH HA, Friday, November 12, 2004 - Page A8, Globe and Mail

MONTREAL -- They met as teenagers at a dance at the local parish and had been together for 38 years, 34 of them as husband and wife.
Today, Lucie Viel is widowed and burdened with Richard Cassista's gambling debts.

With a final profession of love for her in a heart-wrenching suicide note, Ms. Viel's husband killed himself this summer, saying he could no longer endure his addiction to video lottery terminals.

Ms. Viel has gone public with her story, hoping to get help from authorities and giving a rare, dramatic look at the sufferings triggered by gambling addiction.

The 54-year-old retired Quebec-City-area woman turned to the media this week after trying in vain for weeks to contact Quebec Finance Minister Yves Séguin, whose department is responsible for sanctioned gambling in the province.

Since the media heard of her story, Mr. Séguin has called Ms. Viel and promised to meet her next week to see whether any existing foundations can help her.

"They're taking advantage of people to fill their pockets, without thinking of people who could kill themselves," Ms. Viel said in an interview yesterday.

Video lottery terminals contributed $706-million in net income to the Quebec treasury last year.

In interviews and in an open letter to newspapers, Ms. Viel detailed the troubles she and her husband went through.

Since Mr. Cassista died in June, Ms. Viel has been saddled with $48,000 he left in debts.

This includes an unexpected $18,000 credit card bill that a friend brought. Mr. Cassista used to have his MasterCard bills sent to a different address to hide from his wife the depth of his problems.

Scanning through the credit card bill, Ms. Viel saw that most of it consisted of ATM withdrawals from sites near places with VLTs, such as local bars.

She even visited those bars and recalled seeing glazed-eyed gamblers transfixed by their terminals.

"I found it sad. I pictured Richard playing there. It was an obsession. I was seeing it in the eyes of those people there," she said.

The note her husband left makes his feelings clear. Mr. Cassista, a factory administrator, had undertaken therapy to address his addiction but to little effect.

"I can't go on living any more. It's too much," he said at the end in his five-page handwritten note.

"I know it's cowardly but I can't bear it any more. Video poker [machines] in Quebec have been my death. I ask Minister Séguin to react to those many suicides, including mine."

It is estimated that on average, 30 Quebeckers kill themselves each year because of gambling problems.

Quebec has more than 14,000 VLTs in 3,663 bars and restaurants. Mr. Séguin has talked about reducing the number in local bars and eateries to concentrate them in new "racinos," which combine racetracks and other types of gambling.

A study released recently says that a tiny minority of VLT players -- 8 per cent -- are compulsive gamblers who fork out the bulk of the gambling profit: $400-million.

That amount is more than profits from all three of the province's casinos combined, says the study by Serge Chevalier of Quebec's Institut national de santé publique, the provincial public health agency.

Ms. Viel said several acquaintances have come forward since her husband's death to confess that they too are addicted to VLTs.

She is attending a support group for people with relatives who committed suicide because of a gambling addiction.

Out of 10 people, three are spouses whose husbands killed themselves.

"That's a lot, three women out of 10. It's things like that that pushed me into going public."

Friday, November 12, 2004

Instant Cash Withdrawals without leaving the machine: Consequences?

The Rolling Good Times Online report on new technology that would allow gamblers to withdraw money instantly from their bank accounts without leaving the gaming machine or table.
Technology and Gambling: Faster Cash, But At What Cost? discusses the technology which is basically a wireless EFTPOS terminal which is used by an attendant to verify the player's debit or credit card and ensure sufficient funds are available to process the transaction. If successful the attendant would give cash to the player for immediate play.

A limited field trial has been approved in order to assess the impact the technology has on problem gambling rates, but casinos are already lining up for the technology which is the only at machine/table cash withdrawal method that has been successful to this point after in machine credit and debit card readers were deemed to have too significant an impact on problem gambling.

What do you think?

GG

Thursday, November 11, 2004

Neopets games return but lessons learnt

Finally what I expect what will be the last update on the Neopets issue. The Australian McDonalds Neopets promotion has finished and many were waiting to see what would happen when the pressure from MacDonalds had eased.

Well the outcome has been what appears to be a fairly reasonable outcome although those who are anti-gambling or pro the previous presentation of the games will be disappointed.

I have not done extensive testing of this but with a couple of tests one of the highest age group and one of the lowest age group there are differences in the games that are available.

The highest age group who are probably all adult users will have full access to the range of games that include poker and slot machines, card games, casino games etc. The picture below shows some of the games that can be accessed by older users.

Note that 'Jub Jub Blackjack' and 'Krawps' are available to be played.

These games however disappear if a younger neopets user logs in as shown below.


Some lower level gambling forms are still available such as lottery, scratchcards etc. however this minor gaming is also available to children in a range of other mediums and I personally believe that Neopets are following community standards in still allowing this games for younger players (though some will not agree.)

Overall I think this is an effective conclusion to this issue and the risk to Australian children (I do not know if this applies to users from other countries.) I doesn't alter the fact that children should be supervised whilst accessing the internet but that is for someone else to argue.

This is a significant win that with public pressure, debate and eventually common sense to come to a compromise has meant a satisfactory outcome.

Congratulations to all involved including Neopets Inc., for ensuring that the potential harm that can come from early exposure to gambling is reduced.

GG

WTO says Internet Gambling should be allowed

In a decision foreshadowed in March last year, the World Trade Organisation has found in favour of Antigua in a battle with the USA over the latters banning of internet gambling. Antigua, home to many of the world's internet casinos was appealing a US law that prevents US banks and credit card institutions from authorising payments intended for online gambling, saying that it harms a significant industry for their tiny economy.

The USA are appealing, but if the finding is affirmed, this would have a significant impact on internet gambling worldwide, especially if the USA agree to abide by the ruling. That may not happen, but it may force other countries, who do not want to disobey WTO rulings due to having other favourable decisions, to open their borders to internet gambling.

Some Links on the issue

Anyone Want to Give Odds?
Reuters, NY GENEVA
(Reuters) - The United States pledged on Wednesday that it would fight to overturn a World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling favoring the tiny Caribbean ...

Update 1: WTO: US Should Drop Gambling Ban
Forbes, NY
A World Trade Organization panel said Wednesday the US government should drop prohibitions on Americans placing bets in online casinos - a ruling that could ...

WTO confirms ruling against US in gambling dispute with Antigua
Servihoo, Mauritius
The World Trade Organization confirmed that a US prohibition the cross-border gaming and gambling over the Internet was illegal under global trade rules. ...

WTO backs Antigua, rules US online gaming ban is illegal
Las Vegas Sun, NV
Antigua and Barbuda, the Caribbean island nation, won a World Trade Organization ruling that US legislation criminalizing online betting violates global laws. ...

WTO Eyes US Offshore Web Gambling Ban
Newsday, NY
By JONATHAN FOWLER. GENEVA -- In a ruling that could open the United States to offshore Internet gambling, a World Trade Organization ...

GG

Wednesday, November 10, 2004

Slot Machine-Style VLTs - Asta La Vista Baby!

If you look like a slot machine, and play like a slot machine then you are a slot machine according to 'Governator' Arnold Schwarzenegger. The California Governor has given two Indian tribes, the Morongo and Pechanga bands 60 days to remove video lottery terminals (VLTs) that are basically no different from poker machines except for some of the games involved and a slight variation in the way they operate (which would be irrelevant for players and most observers.)

Schwarzenegger says that the machines which were "virtually indistinguishable from slot machines" were unauthorized under the agreements the tribes have with the State of California.

Here are some links on the issue:

Schwarzenegger remains at odds with Indians
The Desert Sun, CA
LOS ANGELES -- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger might have beaten back ballot measures aimed at expanding gambling in California, but ...

Governor: Video lottery must go
The Desert Sun, CA
By Debra Gruszecki. Two Riverside County tribes have gotten a 60-day notice from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s legal affairs secretary ...

Schwarzenegger's office accuses tribes of violating gambling ...
San Jose Mercury News, CA
RIVERSIDE, Calif. - Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's office warned two Riverside County Indian tribes that they were violating state ...

GG

Tuesday, November 09, 2004

David Koch delivers some gambling education

David Koch, finance journalist in the Fairfax press, television presenter on Australia's Seven Network and author has written an article for today's Sydney Morning Herald titled "Australia's odds-on favourite pastime." (Note: The Sydney Morning Herald requires a free subscription. For those wanting to read the article without subscribing a PDF is here.)

The article tries to tell people that gambling is not a way that you should use to increase your wealth. It discusses the history of gambling in Australia while reflecting on the fact that Australian's gambled $122 million on last Tuesday's Melbourne Cup, with $51.3 million from New South Wales alone.

However the main point of this article is, to quote Koch:

Whatever your views on gambling, there is no denying the odds are stacked against you.
Koch goes on to discuss what the odds of some of the various forms of gambling are, and for the first time that I have seen in the mass media talks about poker machines in terms of how much they make not what is paid to players.
Chances of winning on poker machines vary between machines but each machine is programmed to retain 13 per cent of input. This is standard and a legal requirement.
This article does a good job of discussing some gambling information without taking a position for or against it. It speaks to the audience of the broadsheet Sydney Morning Herald as a familiar voice in a style they understand and are comfortable with.

This is the sort of information that can gently inform people about some of the choices they make about gambling and for some it will be a simple factor that may help prevent their gambling moving from entertainment to a harmful, damaging cycle of trying to make money through gambling and inevitably losing more than just dollars and cents.

What do you think about the article?

GG

Monday, November 08, 2004

ANU ACGR Release ACT ATM Research

The Australian Centre for Gambling Research at the ANU have just released a study titled "The Use of ATMs in ACT Gaming Venues: An Empirical Study" which despite saying:

The study found limited evidence to support the removal of ATMs from gaming venues. Although the convenience of ATMs in gaming venues appears to be related to higher gambling expenditure, on balance the study found that removal of ATMs from gaming venues would inconvenience a proportion of recreational gamblers and non-gambling patrons of gaming venues.

Also found that:

  • More self-identified problem gamblers (60%) than other groups usually access ATMs at clubs. Only 25% of regular gamblers, 12.7% of recreational gamblers and 5.2% of non-gamblers usually access an ATM at a club.
  • Regular and problem gamblers tend to access ATMs at gaming venues more frequently than do recreational and non-gamblers.
  • ATM withdrawals of less than $100 are most common for all gambler groups, except for self-identified problem gamblers, of whom 60% report withdrawing more than $100 on the last occasion.
  • Gamblers usually withdraw larger amounts from venue facilities than the non-gamblers; however withdrawals by recreational gamblers are marginally higher than those for regular gamblers.

When asked about alternative proposals such as re-positioning cash facilities within gaming venues and gaming rooms, withdrawal limits and the use of note acceptors for gaming machines, the following policy proposals received the most support:

  • daily limits on the amount of ATM and EFTPOS withdrawals (86% of ACT residents agree these limits should be in place for ATMs, and the same proportion agree in relation to EFTPOS);
  • limits on the size of notes that can be used in gaming machines (78%);
  • bans on cash advances from credit cards at gaming venues (72%);
  • prohibition of ATM or EFTPOS facilities within gaming rooms (72%); and
  • prohibition on gaming machines accepting notes (61%).

Basically the study seems to say that although there is not enough reason to remove ATMs because of problem gambling, if they were removed it would probably do more harm than good.

What do you think about this issue?

GG


Sunday, November 07, 2004

Independence of Industry Funded Gambling Research Under Fire

An article in the Boston Globe titled "Gambling industry link to Harvard draws questions" (PDF of the article is available here) presents a range of opinions on whether industry funded gambling research can be considered independent. One thing is for certain is that these views are not new, in fact at the recent Insight Nova Scotia conference, Sol Boxenbaum and Brenda Thomas of Viva Consulting in Montreal presented a paper "Responsible Gambling: Whose Responsibility Is It? A Critique" which raised many of the same issues.

This raises a few issues:

  • Is the research actually independent, or is it biased by its funding?
  • Is it seen to be independent?
  • If industry doesn't pay for the research, who does?
  • Does government have a role, or do they also have a perceived bias?
  • If industry funded research has an outcome opposing industry practice will it effect future potential funding for that researcher or institution?

These are interesting and difficult questions to answer, especially with any degree of certainty. It is difficult to have an objective opinion on this matter. I think the best that can be done is for researchers and institutions to acknowledge fully and clearly where their funding comes from and any consultation or correspondence they have had with industry. At least then readers can make their own opinions.

What do you think?

GG

Saturday, November 06, 2004

Yale Study links gambling and substance abuse

Psychiatry Researchers at Yale University in the US have published scientific evidence that links gambling at an early age with drug and alcohol abuse.

Study links gambling to abuse of substances - http://www.yaledailynews.com/article.asp?AID=27165

Gambling Among Adolescents And Young Adults Associated With Psychiatric Problems - http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/11/041104011409.htm

GG

Problem Gambling leads to bad health says BMJ

The British Medical Journal writes that problem gambling is a health issue that needs to be taken seriously by the health profession, government and the public alike.

Here is the editorial for the BMJ titled “Betting Your Life On It” http://press.psprings.co.uk/bmj/november/edit1055.pdf

Also some other related articles:

Gambling is bad for your health
Guardian, UK - Gambling is not only hard on your pocket but bad for your health, according to the British Medical Journal. Although gambling is ...

Gambling reforms pose health concerns
Reuters, UK - LONDON (Reuters) - Gaming reforms will lead to an increase in the number of problem gamblers and could pose a serious health concern for doctors, an expert says ...

abuse fears over Gambling Bill
Telegraph.co.uk, UK - By Celia Hall, Medical Editor. Plans to alter gambling laws will increase the number of addicts and add to the problems of domestic ...

Problem Gambling Can Lead to Bad Health
WebMD - Nov. 4, 2004 -- Problem gambling deserves attention from the public and health care providers alike, says a British expert on gambling. ...

GG

Friday, November 05, 2004

UK Gambling Bill Passes But Government under pressure to make changes

The UK gambling bill yesterday passed the House of Commons despite many government members either opposing the bill or abstaining from the vote.

Here are some links on the issue. (From Google News)

GG

Pro-casino MPs put on gambling committee
This is London, UK - 3 Nov 2004By Jason Beattie Political Correspondent, Evening Standard. A group of backbench Labour MPs who keenly support an expansion of Britain's ...

Quit while you're ahead
Guardian, UK - 2 Nov 2004It would be reassuring to think that the promise of further concessions on the gambling bill is proof that the government is belatedly listening to its critics ...

Casino Bill suffers blow
Telegraph.co.uk, UK - 2 Nov 2004By Andrew Sparrow. Ministers are expected to announce further concessions on the Gambling Bill after Labour's majority plummeted in a Commons vote. ...

Deep down, they still think that Nanny knows best
Telegraph.co.uk, UK - 2 Nov 2004IN the Commons on Monday, during the second reading of the Gambling Bill, Tessa Jowell, the Culture Secretary, defended her plans to relax the gaming laws with ...

Yesterday in parliament
Guardian, UK - 2 Nov 2004The government's majority was halved as 29 Labour backbenchers rebelled against plans that would allow huge Las Vegas-style casinos to open in Britain. ...

MPs deal a blow to super-casinos
Manchester Evening News, UK - 2 Nov 2004PLANS for Las Vegas-style casinos and fruit machines with £1m jackpots were approved in the Commons, despite a revolt against the government scheme by Labour ...

Labour warnings on Welsh casinos
BBC News, UK - 2 Nov 2004A claim that "super casinos" would help regenerate poorer areas of Wales has been dismissed by a Labour MP. Jon Owen Jones was among ...

Ministers in climbdown on super-casinos
The Scotsman, UK - 2 Nov 2004THE Government was today considering offering new concessions over its controversial Gambling Bill after a major revolt halved its majority. ...

Rebellion to bring new retreat over casinos
This is London, UK - 2 Nov 2004By Paul Waugh Deputy Political Editor, Evening Standard. Further Government concessions over its Gambling Bill looked certain today ...

Gambling reforms survive MPs' rebellion
ITV.com, UK - 1 Nov 2004Las Vegas-style super-casinos are a step closer after Prime Minister Tony Blair saw off a Commons rebellion over gambling reforms. ...

MPs urged to amend liberal new UK gambling laws
Business Report, South Africa - 1 Nov 2004By Peter Walker. London - The British government faced anger from its legislators yesterday over a new bill to license a wave of ...

concessions fail to sway Labour rebels
Guardian, UK - 1 Nov 2004Tony Blair saw his parliamentary majority cut by more than half last night when 29 Labour MPs rebelled against the gambling bill in protest at plans to set up ...

Blair Wins Gambling Vote But Sees Majority Halved
The Scotsman, UK - 1 Nov 2004By James Lyons, Political Correspondent, PA News. US-style super-casinos are a step closer today after Tony Blair saw off a Commons ...

MPs of all parties challenge Jowell
Guardian, UK - 1 Nov 2004Frank Dobson, the former health secretary, issued the government with a stern warning yesterday that its gambling bill would be "bad for the country, bad for ...

Britain passes casino legislation
The Age (subscription), Australia - 1 Nov 2004Legislation that would allow giant Las Vegas-style casinos to operate in Britain cleared an important Parliamentary hurdle, despite fears that the new law ...

Gambling Rebels Halve Labour's Majority
Scotland on Sunday, UK - 1 Nov 2004By Trevor Mason, Parliamentary Editor, PA News. The Government’s majority was halved tonight as Labour backbenchers rebelled against ...

Government fights gambling law opponents
Reuters, UK - 1 Nov 2004By Mike Peacock. LONDON (Reuters) - The government is battling fierce opposition to its gambling reforms, saying no Las Vegas-style ...

Jowell tries to win over casino rebels
Guardian, UK - 1 Nov 2004The cultural secretary, Tessa Jowell, today tried to persuade sceptical Labour backbenchers that the gambling bill will not lead to a substantial rise in the ...

Thursday, November 04, 2004

GG on leave but information still coming

Hi all,

I will be on annual leave till the 15th November and won't be putting a lot of time into GuruBlog during this time but I will keep posting links (hopefully) daily to gambling issues in Australia and around the world. My comments will be limited (if any during this time) but I hope to revisit any key issues when I return in ten days time.

GG

Ontario admits gambling problem but won't seek help

Premier of the Canadian Province of Ontario has admitted his province is dependent on the revenue from problem gamblers but refuses to take action. Here are some articles on the issue.

Gambling Here to Stay: McGuinty

Ontario addicted to gambling revenue

Ontario wins 35% of gambling cash from problem gamblers

Problem gamblers big source of Ont. revenue

GG

Wednesday, November 03, 2004

SPAM being sent as my email address

It has been brought to my attention that spam has been sent to various people using my email address. I am aware of how this email is being sent but I do not know who is sending it or why they are doing it.

I apologise for any inconvenience this may cause, I hope that I can stop the person as soon as possible.

GG.

Comments on the Joe Treyes Case

This morning I received an email from Joe Treyes himself asking me for my promised comments on the The Patient Gambler article posted on October 31 2004 Here is my view on the issue.

Firstly Joe's gambling behaviour would have appeared problematic well before he was self-excluded, and at this early stage the Mohawk or Woodbine staff should have acted.

However once the self-excusion deed was signed, the racinos had a clear responsibility to act. Signing that deed is an expression that the gambler needs assistance to prevent them from gambling further, for if they could stop by themselves they would without having to sign anything. The failure of the venues to live up to their responsibilities as outlined in the agreement amounts to a breach of contract, and a failure to meet a clear duty of care to its patrons.

In fact by assisting Joe to return to the gambling floor, they are actually encouraging Joe to gamble, especially in a state where they know that his judgement is impaired by his illness. Gambling is supposed to be an informed choice - but would you put an admitted problem gambler who has acknowledged that he cannot control his gambling, and you as the operator also know he suffers from an illness that impairs his judgement even further back in a situation where he is surrounded by gambling options. This is not only reckless, it seems to me to border on negligent.

I am not saying that this is what happens in every case of self-exclusion, but in this case it seems that the venues had every opportunity to meet their obligations but not only failed to do so, it appears they knowingly exacerbated the problem.

Gambling is a activity that requires informed choice and consent. In an impaired state such as suffering from parkinsons, I don't believe it is clear whether consent can be given.

I think it is clear that the operator failed in their duty, and if such a significant case happened here I would recommend discussing the situation with the Advocate for Responsible Gambling, the regulator and even potentially a lawyer to work out if their are any options for recourse.

This is not the typical non-detection of a self-excluded patron, this is where a venue knowingly encouraged a self-excuded patron with impaired judgement to gamble. If the venue does not have a demonstrable duty of care in this case, I don't know when they do.

GG